Some psychologists say that the criminal personality is learned and not inherited. The criminal, as a young person, acquires a particular ideology of society which gives him a warped view of morals. Through his experiences and associations with other criminals this picture is gradually enforced. Thus he knows deep down that he is wrong and this brings a sense of guilt. But he concocts a false image of reality in order to clear away guilt. This can also be said of homosexuals. But the important difference is that the criminal usually has a marginal sense of honor and somehow values courage. But the homosexual, in contrast to this, has no sense of honor. In referring to persons of normal sexual orientation as ‘breeders’, the homosexual betrays his sense of contempt for whatever is noble.
Let us take the case of Socrates. Legend says that Alcibiades, who was of renowned physical beauty, devised a scheme to glean some of Socrates’ wisdom by seducing him. Socrates denied the offer and said that his wisdom and the young man’s moral improvement were of infinitely more value than his own pleasure. Thus the proposition was not a fair deal. The point is that we do not find even a trace of themodern homosexual mindset in Socrates. What is the reason for that? Possibly it was that homosexuality in ancient Greece carried no social stigma and thus the ‘criminal-like’ mentality seen in modern homosexuals did not develop there.
The principal reason the modern homosexual has such a twisted sense of morals and shows such hatred and contempt for normal persons is that the modern world has confused morality and tradition with legality. Legalizing an abominable thing like homosexuality will not make it moral automatically. Nor will it heal the aberrated personality of homosexuals. Counterintuitive rules will only destroy the fabric of society, and the demonic ‘will-to-live’ that has been born out of modern society’s infatuation with homosexuality and lesbianism, will perpetuate itself indefinitely.